White Swirl

I was hoping that would be lenticular too!

rsimms3 wrote:

Kali Durga wrote:

dylnfan wrote:

Aquamarine wrote:Meg has been replaced in both those pictures . . .

Yeah, not sure how I feel about Jack replacing her in the promo photo. Just seems like she's being left out.

I think it only looks that way in the cover photo (bottom right corner of that image) because it's the lenticular cover. You can see a shadow of her hair and the other guy's hat.

He's talking about the inside cover, the photo of Jack and the twins.

Correct.

dylnfan wrote:

rsimms3 wrote:

Kali Durga wrote:

dylnfan wrote:

Aquamarine wrote:Meg has been replaced in both those pictures . . .

Yeah, not sure how I feel about Jack replacing her in the promo photo. Just seems like she's being left out.

I think it only looks that way in the cover photo (bottom right corner of that image) because it's the lenticular cover. You can see a shadow of her hair and the other guy's hat.

He's talking about the inside cover, the photo of Jack and the twins.

Correct.

Yes, but she, aquamarine, seems to be talking about both photos, since she used the word "both". Apparently I should have only quoted her post.

Ah, confusion averted.

My point basically was that if you look at the bottom two pictures, even if we're only getting one angle of the lenticular cover, they're pictures where we're used to seeing Meg, and now we don't.

Aquamarine wrote:My point basically was that if you look at the bottom two pictures, even if we're only getting one angle of the lenticular cover, they're pictures where we're used to seeing Meg, and now we don't.

but you will....you just have to look at the other angle!

But you will if you hold the lenticular cover the correct way! She's still there and, even if she's not, she's still in our hearts. Right?

I dunno why Jack felt the need to recreate that image with himself in Meg's place. As usual with him, gotta wonder whether he anticipated the reaction and did it provocatively or ingenuously.

Just realized the new Jack picture will be the back cover, not the inner cover after they fold it. Top half is the inside, bottom half the outside with the spine separating the new Jack picture and the lenticular cover.

As for Jack replacing Meg, at least he kept the balance by changing the men to women and the kick drum from a woman to a man. Rita Hayworth?

rsimms3 wrote:Just realized the new Jack picture will be the back cover, not the inner cover after they fold it. Top half is the inside, bottom half the outside with the spine separating the new Jack picture and the lenticular cover.

As for Jack replacing Meg, at least he kept the balance by changing the men to women and the kick drum from a woman to a man. Rita Hayworth?

Yes, he does think of those details. Rita to Gregory. Were they ever in a film together...?

Kali Durga wrote:But you will if you hold the lenticular cover the correct way!

Yes, I know how a lenticular image works. But that's not the angle that appears in that image I just reposted, which is what I was commenting on.

Aquamarine wrote:

Kali Durga wrote:But you will if you hold the lenticular cover the correct way!

Yes, I know how a lenticular image works. But that's not the angle that appears in that image I just reposted, which is what I was commenting on.

That was just a random quick picture someone took....it's not a promotional image or anything.

rsimms3 wrote:Just realized the new Jack picture will be the back cover, not the inner cover after they fold it. Top half is the inside, bottom half the outside with the spine separating the new Jack picture and the lenticular cover.

Strange. I can only assume that won't be the case when the proper sleeves are printed, the image with the track listing also has all the legal blurb and record label logos at the bottom and I don't think I've ever seen that on the inside of the gatefold instead of the back.

Stl_ben wrote:

Aquamarine wrote:

Kali Durga wrote:But you will if you hold the lenticular cover the correct way!

Yes, I know how a lenticular image works. But that's not the angle that appears in that image I just reposted, which is what I was commenting on.

That was just a random quick picture someone took....it's not a promotional image or anything.

I know!!!! I'm just commenting on what I'm looking at IN THOSE PARTICULAR IMAGES. It makes zero difference if it looks different from another angle, I'm talking about WHAT I'M LOOKING AT THERE!!

All clear now?

Jamie wrote:

rsimms3 wrote:Just realized the new Jack picture will be the back cover, not the inner cover after they fold it. Top half is the inside, bottom half the outside with the spine separating the new Jack picture and the lenticular cover.

Strange. I can only assume that won't be the case when the proper sleeves are printed, the image with the track listing also has all the legal blurb and record label logos at the bottom and I don't think I've ever seen that on the inside of the gatefold instead of the back.

Impulse records did this for a long long time.

Unless they're doing different versions of the cover with the b&w Meg and Jack photos, I don't see the point in recreating the photo with Jack in it and using that for every copy. Especially when everybody knows that it's a post-white stripes image of his.
But that's my problem.
It looks really cool otherwise.